New Data: Phytoplankton Emissions Are a Major, Underestimated Source of Climate-Cooling Aerosols
A landmark CERN study reveals that marine phytoplankton produce significantly more cloud-seeding aerosols than previously understood, offering hope that the biosphere can partially buffer the climate against warming.
By Factlen Editorial Team
- Atmospheric Physicists
- Focus on the mechanics of particle nucleation and the urgent need to update global climate models to account for MSA and MeSH.
- Climate Optimists
- Emphasize the Earth's natural resilience and the biosphere's unexpected ability to buffer against the loss of anthropogenic aerosols.
- Marine Ecologists
- Highlight that this cooling mechanism is entirely dependent on the biological health of phytoplankton, which are threatened by warming oceans.
What's not represented
- · Geoengineering Advocates
Why this matters
As the world successfully reduces industrial air pollution, we are inadvertently removing a layer of artificial aerosols that have been masking global warming. This new data proves that nature's own marine aerosols can help bridge that gap, making worst-case warming scenarios less likely.
Key points
- Phytoplankton emit sulfur gases that oxidize into cloud-seeding aerosols.
- Climate models previously underestimated the cooling effect of methanesulfonic acid (MSA).
- CERN experiments prove MSA and sulfuric acid work synergistically to accelerate cloud formation tenfold.
- This natural cooling mechanism helps offset the loss of artificial aerosols from fossil fuels.
- The planet's biological thermostat is more resilient than previously modeled.
For decades, climate scientists have understood that the Earth's oceans act as a massive thermal sponge, absorbing the lion's share of the heat trapped by greenhouse gases. But new data reveals that the ocean's smallest inhabitants are actively fighting back against warming through the atmosphere.[3]
A landmark study published this week in the journal Nature by the CLOUD Collaboration at CERN has fundamentally rewritten the math on marine aerosols. The research demonstrates that phytoplankton—microscopic marine algae—are producing far more heat-mitigating cloud particles than previously accounted for in global climate models.[1][2]
The findings offer a rare injection of optimism into climate projections. As humanity reduces its burning of fossil fuels, we are inadvertently removing a massive source of artificial atmospheric cooling. This new evidence suggests the marine biosphere possesses a built-in buffering capacity that may help compensate for that loss.[3]

To understand the breakthrough, one must look at how clouds form. Clouds do not materialize out of thin air; water vapor requires tiny suspended particles, known as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN), to condense around.[2]
When the concentration of these aerosol particles increases, clouds become composed of smaller, more numerous droplets. This makes the clouds physically brighter and more reflective, bouncing incoming solar radiation back into space before it can heat the Earth's surface—a phenomenon known as the aerosol cooling effect.[1][3]
Historically, the most important vapor for creating these nuclei has been sulfuric acid. Since the dawn of the Industrial Revolution, the burning of coal and oil has pumped vast quantities of sulfur dioxide into the sky, which oxidizes into sulfuric acid.[2]
This anthropogenic pollution has acted as a massive, unintentional sunshade. Climate models estimate that human-made aerosols have masked a substantial fraction of the warming that greenhouse gases would have otherwise caused.[6]

This anthropogenic pollution has acted as a massive, unintentional sunshade.
This creates a well-documented 'Catch-22' for environmental policy. As nations successfully implement clean-air regulations and scrub sulfur dioxide from power plants and shipping fuels, the artificial sunshade is being pulled away. Without it, scientists have feared a sudden, sharp spike in global temperatures.[3]
Enter the phytoplankton. These marine organisms naturally emit a gas called dimethyl sulfide (DMS), which accounts for roughly 20 percent of all atmospheric sulfur. When DMS oxidizes in the air, it produces two primary compounds: sulfuric acid (SA) and methanesulfonic acid (MSA).[1][2]
Until now, climate models largely ignored MSA, assuming that only the sulfuric acid pathway was efficient enough to drive the spontaneous formation of new particles, a process called nucleation.[2]
By recreating pristine marine atmospheric conditions inside CERN's ultra-clean CLOUD chamber, researchers discovered that models have been missing half the picture. At temperatures below -10°C, MSA is just as effective as sulfuric acid at driving particle nucleation in the presence of ammonia.[1][3]

More importantly, the two acids do not just operate in isolation—they work synergistically. The CERN experiments revealed that when MSA and SA mix, particle nucleation rates can accelerate by up to tenfold, and the subsequent growth of those particles can double, compared to sulfuric acid alone.[1][3]
This means that in cool marine environments and polar regions, the biological production of MSA is a massive, previously uncounted engine for cloud formation. 'Our model simulations indicate that MSA-driven new particle formation may account for the major missing source of marine aerosol particles in current models,' noted Jasper Kirkby, spokesperson for the CLOUD Collaboration.[2][3]
The CERN findings corroborate a growing body of evidence that marine biological cooling has been severely underestimated. In late 2024, researchers discovered that another phytoplankton emission, methanethiol (MeSH), increases the sulfate aerosol burden over the Southern Ocean by up to 70 percent, further plugging the gaps in climate models.[4][5]

While this biological thermostat provides a hopeful buffer, it is not a silver bullet. The ultimate efficacy of this natural cooling system depends entirely on the health of the phytoplankton themselves. If ocean acidification and extreme marine heatwaves disrupt these microscopic ecosystems, their ability to seed the clouds and cool the planet could collapse just when we need it most.[5][7]
How we got here
1989
The CLAW hypothesis proposes that phytoplankton regulate the Earth's climate by emitting DMS, which forms cooling clouds.
2011–2017
Multiple studies suggest marine biogenic aerosols make up a smaller fraction of cloud nuclei than previously thought, casting doubt on the ocean's cooling capacity.
Nov 2024
Researchers discover methanethiol (MeSH) is a major, previously uncounted source of climate-cooling sulfur emitted by the ocean.
June 2026
CERN's CLOUD collaboration proves that methanesulfonic acid (MSA) from phytoplankton synergistically accelerates cloud formation, confirming nature's massive cooling capacity.
Viewpoints in depth
Atmospheric Physicists
Focus on the mechanics of particle nucleation and the urgent need to update global climate models.
Researchers in this camp argue that the current generation of climate models is fundamentally incomplete because it relies almost exclusively on sulfuric acid to predict cloud condensation nuclei. By proving that methanesulfonic acid (MSA) and methanethiol (MeSH) play massive, synergistic roles in particle nucleation, physicists argue that we must recalibrate our understanding of climate sensitivity. They emphasize that without accurate baseline data on natural aerosols, our predictions regarding the consequences of removing anthropogenic pollution will remain flawed.
Climate Optimists
Emphasize the Earth's natural resilience and the biosphere's unexpected ability to buffer against warming.
This perspective views the CERN findings as a profound validation of the Earth's self-regulating capacity. For years, the 'Catch-22' of air quality—where cleaning up fossil fuel emissions removes the aerosols that mask global warming—has been a source of deep anxiety. Optimists point to this new data as evidence that Mother Nature has a built-in shock absorber. The marine biosphere's ability to ramp up cloud-seeding aerosols means the transition away from fossil fuels may not trigger the catastrophic temperature spikes some models predicted.
Marine Ecologists
Highlight that this cooling mechanism is entirely dependent on the biological health of phytoplankton.
While acknowledging the cooling power of marine aerosols, ecologists warn against complacency. They argue that this entire atmospheric buffering system is predicated on a thriving, healthy population of phytoplankton. As the oceans absorb excess carbon dioxide and become more acidic, and as marine heatwaves become more frequent, the very organisms responsible for emitting these cooling gases are under unprecedented stress. If the phytoplankton populations collapse, this natural thermostat will fail alongside them.
What we don't know
- How rising ocean temperatures and acidification will affect the overall population and distribution of phytoplankton.
- Whether the synergistic cooling effect of MSA scales linearly across all global marine environments or is localized to specific regions.
- Exactly how much of the 'aerosol masking effect' lost by reducing fossil fuels will be successfully offset by these natural emissions.
Key terms
- Cloud Condensation Nuclei (CCN)
- Tiny solid or liquid particles suspended in the atmosphere that water vapor condenses around to form cloud droplets.
- Dimethyl sulfide (DMS)
- A sulfur-containing gas naturally emitted by marine phytoplankton that plays a key role in atmospheric chemistry.
- Methanesulfonic acid (MSA)
- An atmospheric acid formed from the oxidation of DMS that has now been proven to drive cloud particle formation.
- Aerosol Masking Effect
- The phenomenon where particle pollution reflects sunlight, temporarily hiding or 'masking' a portion of the global warming caused by greenhouse gases.
- Nucleation
- The spontaneous process where trace gases in the atmosphere cluster together to form entirely new solid or liquid particles.
Frequently asked
Why do aerosols cool the climate?
Aerosols act as seeds for cloud droplets. More aerosols mean clouds have smaller, more numerous droplets, making them brighter and better at reflecting sunlight back into space.
If aerosols cool the planet, why are fossil fuel emissions bad?
While the sulfur dioxide from fossil fuels creates cooling aerosols, the carbon dioxide released simultaneously traps heat for centuries. Furthermore, fossil fuel aerosols cause severe air pollution that damages human health.
What does this mean for global warming predictions?
It suggests that as we clean up industrial air pollution, the sudden loss of artificial cooling might be partially offset by the ocean's natural aerosol production, making the transition slightly less severe than feared.
Sources
[1]NatureAtmospheric Physicists
Role of methanesulfonic acid in atmospheric particle nucleation and growth
Read on Nature →[2]CERNAtmospheric Physicists
CLOUD experiment uncovers a major new source of marine aerosol particles
Read on CERN →[3]The DebriefClimate Optimists
CERN Provides Good News on Climate Change as Nature Proves Unexpectedly Resilient
Read on The Debrief →[4]Science AdvancesAtmospheric Physicists
Methanethiol is a significant contributor to global ocean sulfur emissions and to sulfate aerosol cooling
Read on Science Advances →[5]SciTechDailyMarine Ecologists
Plankton's Secret Emissions: New Ocean Discovery Challenges Climate Predictions
Read on SciTechDaily →[6]Down To EarthClimate Optimists
Global climate models underestimate cooling effect of aerosols
Read on Down To Earth →[7]Ocean VisionsMarine Ecologists
Assessment outlines priority actions needed to answer if phytoplankton can contribute to large-scale carbon dioxide removal
Read on Ocean Visions →
Every angle. Every day.
Get data analysis stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns delivered to your inbox.







