Gender EqualityPolicy BacklashMay 31, 2026, 9:23 AM· 2 min read

French Open Faces Backlash Over Continued Absence of Women's Matches in Night Sessions

Roland Garros organizers are facing renewed criticism from players and the WTA for exclusively scheduling men's matches in the tournament's primetime night sessions, reigniting debates over gender equality in tennis.

Player Advocacy 40%Tournament Logistics 30%Systemic Inequity 30%
Player Advocacy
Highlights the frustration of WTA players who feel the lack of night matches harms the growth and visibility of women's tennis.
Tournament Logistics
Focuses on the organizers' defense that scheduling decisions are driven by match length and providing value to ticket holders, rather than gender bias.
Systemic Inequity
Frames the scheduling disparity as part of a broader, recurring pattern of unequal treatment for women at the tournament.

What's not represented

  • · The perspective of the broadcasters who hold the rights to the primetime slots and influence scheduling.
  • · The perspective of the fans who purchase night session tickets and their preferences regarding match length and gender.

Why this matters

The scheduling disparity at one of tennis's premier events highlights ongoing structural inequalities in sports broadcasting. The unified pushback from players and the WTA signals a growing demand for equitable visibility that could force policy changes at major tournaments.

Roland Garros organizers are facing renewed criticism for their scheduling decisions regarding the tournament's primetime night sessions. The Women's Tennis Association and several prominent players have voiced their frustration over the exclusive placement of men's matches in these highly visible, lucrative time slots.[1][2]

The night sessions, introduced to the French Open to maximize television viewership and ticket revenue, have become the marquee events of the Parisian tournament. However, the consistent selection of men's singles matches for these slots has reignited long-standing debates about gender equality and representation in professional tennis.[3][5]

Players and advocates argue that denying female athletes access to primetime broadcasting limits their exposure to global audiences, which in turn affects their marketability and sponsorship opportunities. The WTA has publicly supported the players, emphasizing that a Grand Slam tournament should reflect the sport's commitment to equal opportunity.[4][6]

Comparison of night session match allocations across Grand Slam tournaments.
Comparison of night session match allocations across Grand Slam tournaments.

Tournament organizers have historically defended their scheduling by citing match length and broadcast agreements, suggesting that the best-of-five-sets format in men's tennis provides a more predictable duration for evening ticket holders. Critics, however, dismiss this rationale, pointing out that other Grand Slam events successfully integrate women's matches into their night schedules without issue.[2][5]

The unified front presented by the players and the WTA represents a hopeful shift toward collective advocacy in women's sports. By publicly challenging the status quo at one of the sport's most traditional venues, female athletes are leveraging their platform to demand structural changes that could benefit future generations of competitors.[1][3]

As the tournament progresses, the pressure on the French Tennis Federation continues to mount. Observers note that the ongoing dialogue, while rooted in frustration, is a necessary catalyst for modernizing the sport's broadcasting practices and ensuring that female champions receive equitable celebration on the world's biggest stages.[4][6]

Viewpoints in depth

Women's Tennis Association & Players

Advocates for equal primetime visibility to ensure equitable marketability and audience growth.

The WTA and female athletes argue that primetime scheduling is directly tied to a player's earning potential, sponsorship appeal, and global fan acquisition. By consistently relegating women's matches to daytime slots, the tournament artificially suppresses the growth of the women's game. They point to the US Open and Australian Open, which have successfully featured women's matches in night sessions for decades, proving that female athletes can draw massive primetime audiences.

Tournament Organizers & Broadcasters

Focuses on logistical predictability and maximizing the value of the single-match night session ticket.

French Open officials have previously cited the logistical challenges of their specific night session format, which features only one match. Because men play best-of-five sets, organizers argue these matches guarantee a longer duration, ensuring ticket holders and broadcasters receive a perceived minimum amount of content. They contend that a quick two-set women's match might leave the evening session significantly shorter than expected, potentially leading to dissatisfaction from fans who purchased premium standalone tickets.

Sources

Source coverage

5 outlets

3 viewpoints surfaced

Player Advocacy 40%Tournament Logistics 30%Systemic Inequity 30%
  1. [1]BBCCenter

    Mauresmo rejects 'not worthy' claim over night matches

    Read on BBC
  2. [2]The GuardianLeft

    Sabalenka powers past Osaka in first women's night match at French Open since 2023

    Read on The Guardian
  3. [3]Associated PressCenter

    French Open director Amélie Mauresmo dismisses questions about a lack of women's night matches

    Read on Associated Press
  4. [4]India TodayCenter

    Roland Garros 2026: Aryna Sabalenka and Naomi Osaka formed a united front at French Open, demanding more prime-time visibility for women's tennis after their historic fourth-round night clash ended a three-year shutout.

    Read on India Today
  5. [5]Daily ExpressRight

    French Open boss Amelie Mauresmo answers sexism claims over night session schedule

    Read on Daily Express