Explainer: How the Expanded BRICS Bloc is Pursuing De-Dollarization in 2026
The expanded BRICS alliance is accelerating efforts to reduce reliance on the U.S. dollar through local currency trade and alternative payment systems, prompting tariff threats from the U.S. government.
- Domestic Economic Harm
- Emphasizes the direct costs of the retaliatory tariffs on U.S. consumers, businesses, and GDP through inflation and trade disruption.
- Geopolitical Alienation
- Highlights how the tariff threats are alienating international partners and accelerating the very de-dollarization they aim to prevent.
- Multipolar Financial Shift
- Focuses on the structural reality of BRICS nations building alternative financial infrastructure and local currency systems to bypass U.S. economic leverage.
What's not represented
- · Arguments defending the tariffs as a necessary tool to protect U.S. economic dominance and the dollar's reserve status.
- · Impact on developing nations outside BRICS caught in the crossfire of the tariff war.
Why this matters
A successful shift away from the U.S. dollar by the expanded BRICS bloc could increase borrowing costs for American consumers and reshape global trade routes. If the U.S. retaliates with 100% tariffs, it risks triggering a global trade war that would sharply raise prices on imported goods.
The expanded BRICS alliance—now comprising nine nations following its 2024 enlargement—is accelerating its strategic shift away from the U.S. dollar, setting ambitious targets for alternative financial infrastructure by 2026. This push for de-dollarization primarily focuses on settling cross-border trade in local currencies rather than launching a unified fiat currency, a move designed to insulate member economies from Western sanctions and dollar liquidity shocks. The bloc's efforts have drawn sharp warnings from the United States, where political leaders have recently threatened to impose 100% tariffs on any BRICS nation that actively undermines the dollar's status as the global reserve currency.[1][2][3][4][7]
At the core of the 2026 agenda is the development of independent cross-border payment mechanisms. BRICS nations are actively testing blockchain-based digital currency bridges, such as the mBridge project, and expanding the conceptual "BRICS Pay" system to bypass the Western-dominated SWIFT network. By linking their domestic financial messaging systems, countries like Russia and China have already managed to settle over 90% of their bilateral trade in rubles and yuan. The bloc aims to standardize these bilateral agreements into a multilateral framework, allowing newer members like the United Arab Emirates and Egypt to seamlessly trade energy and agricultural goods without converting to dollars.[1][3][4][5]
The inclusion of major energy producers has fundamentally altered the bloc's leverage in global commodity markets. With the addition of Iran and the UAE, alongside founding member Russia, the BRICS coalition now controls roughly 43% of global crude oil production. Historically, the global oil trade has been exclusively priced and settled in U.S. dollars—the so-called petrodollar system. By encouraging major importers like China and India to purchase oil using their own currencies, the expanded bloc is directly challenging one of the foundational pillars of U.S. economic hegemony.[2][3][5][6]

In response to these coordinated efforts, U.S. policymakers are drafting aggressive countermeasures. The incoming U.S. administration has explicitly warned that countries participating in the creation of a rival BRICS currency or actively transitioning away from the dollar will face devastating 100% tariffs on their exports to the United States. Proponents of this hardline approach argue that defending the dollar is a vital national security interest, as the currency's dominance allows the U.S. to run massive deficits and project geopolitical power through economic sanctions. However, trade experts warn that such sweeping tariffs could trigger a global trade war, fracturing global supply chains and driving up domestic inflation.[4][6][7]
Despite the political momentum, the BRICS de-dollarization project faces severe structural headwinds. The U.S. dollar still accounts for nearly 58% of global foreign exchange reserves and is involved in nearly 90% of global forex transactions. Furthermore, the bloc is hindered by deep internal divisions. India, for instance, remains wary of any financial architecture that would disproportionately elevate the Chinese yuan, given the ongoing geopolitical tensions between New Delhi and Beijing. Because most BRICS currencies are not fully convertible and lack deep, liquid bond markets, convincing private multinational corporations to abandon the dollar remains a monumental, perhaps insurmountable, challenge for the 2026 timeline.[1][2][3][5][6]

Viewpoints in depth
U.S. Economic Defenders
Viewing de-dollarization as a direct national security threat that requires aggressive deterrence.
From the perspective of U.S. policymakers and defense strategists, the dollar's status as the world's reserve currency is not just an economic convenience, but a core pillar of American hard power. It allows the U.S. government to finance its debt at lower costs and effectively sanction hostile state actors by cutting them off from the global financial system. Consequently, efforts by BRICS to build alternative payment rails are viewed as direct attempts to neutralize U.S. foreign policy tools. Proponents of this view argue that threatening 100% tariffs is a necessary and proportionate deterrent to prevent the fracturing of the global financial order.
BRICS Multipolar Advocates
Arguing that the weaponization of the dollar necessitates an independent financial infrastructure.
For nations within the BRICS bloc, particularly Russia, China, and Iran, de-dollarization is framed as a defensive necessity rather than an offensive attack. These nations argue that the U.S. has increasingly weaponized the SWIFT system and dollar-clearing networks to punish geopolitical rivals, making reliance on the dollar a severe sovereign risk. By trading in local currencies and developing blockchain-based settlement systems like mBridge, these countries aim to create a 'multipolar' financial system. In their view, a decentralized financial architecture ensures economic sovereignty and protects developing nations from extraterritorial U.S. sanctions.
Skeptical Financial Markets
Highlighting the structural impossibilities of replacing the dollar's deep liquidity and trust.
Institutional investors and currency analysts largely view the BRICS de-dollarization timeline with deep skepticism. They point out that a reserve currency requires deep, transparent, and highly liquid bond markets, backed by the rule of law and free capital mobility—qualities currently lacking in major BRICS economies like China and Russia. Furthermore, internal rivalries, such as the border disputes between India and China, make the adoption of a single BRICS currency highly improbable. Financial markets generally believe that while BRICS may successfully increase bilateral local-currency trade at the margins, the dollar's entrenched network effects will prevent any systemic unseating in the near future.
Sources
[1]AP NewsCenter
Trump threatens 100% tariff on the BRIC bloc of nations if they act to undermine US dollar
Read on AP News →[2]TIMELean Left
Trump Threatens Extra 10% Tariff for Countries 'Aligning' Themselves With 'Anti-American' BRICS Policies
Read on TIME →[3]Peterson Institute for International EconomicsCenter
Trump's threatened tariffs projected to harm economies of US and the BRICS
Read on Peterson Institute for International Economics →[4]American Action ForumLean Right
The Cost of a BRICS Tariff
Read on American Action Forum →[5]Green Central BankingLean Left
BRICS leaders push local currency lending to address climate finance currency risks
Read on Green Central Banking →
More in news politics
news politics
One Dead, Dozens Injured After Drone Strike Hits Kuwait International Airport Amid US-Iran Escalation
7 sources
news politics
Fact Check: The Efficacy of Crowdsourced Fact-Checking in Reducing Misinformation
7 sources
news politics
Austria, Portugal, and Kyrgyzstan Among Five Elected to UN Security Council as Germany Loses Bid
5 sources
news politics
US-Iran Ceasefire Falters as Regional Strikes Resume and US House Weighs War Powers Resolution
7 sources









